Cornell Drops Exchanges With Chinese Sch

原创 st0012  2020-02-06 06:57 

BEIJING— Cornell University has cut two exchange programs with a top Chinese school over academic freedom concerns, the Ivy League school said, after Chinese students were punished for supporting labor rights in China. The move is a rare step for a U.S. university, many of which are eager to court fun88 ties with China due to its huge education market, amid international criticism of tightening Chinese government controls on scholarship. Cornell’s School of Industrial and Labour Relations (ILR) suspended the small programs with its counterparts at Beijing-based Renmin University after several Chinese student activists were punished for supporting protests at a welding machinery firm in the southern Chinese city of Huizhou. “The decision stemmed from concerns that students at the Chinese institution were being penalized for speaking out about labor rights,” Provost Michael Kotlikoff said in a statement on Oct. 30. Kotlikoff said Cornell had a history of meaningful exchanges with China and an “overarching commitment to academic freedom,” adding that the suspension did not affect other Cornell academic programs in China. The suspension of the exchanges was first reported by the Financial Times. Labor activism is viewed as a challenge by the ruling Communist Party, which opposes independent unions and punishes protesters. Under Chinese leader Xi Jinping, Beijing has stepped up censorship, tightened controls on the internet and various aspects of civil society, and reasserted party authority over academia and other institutions. Chinese officials have also campaigned against the spread of “Western values” at universities and the party’s anti-corruption watchdog has sent inspectors to monitor teachers for “improper” remarks in class. In August, police in riot gear stormed an apartment in Huizhou where activists, including students from many top Chinese schools, were staying while they supported factory workers at Jasic International seeking to form a union. Some of the students were detained and a document was leaked on social media which revealed details of how Renmin University planned to keep vocal students under surveillance on campus. “We are a labor school. They are a labor school. This was an academic freedom violation that was related directly to a labor issue,” Eli Friedman, the director of international programs at ILR who made the decision with Cornell administrators, told Reuters. “It crossed too many lines, as far as I was concerned.” Friedman notified Renmin of the suspension in an email on Oct. 20, according to an image he posted on Twitter on Oct. 29. In the email, he said he had seen evidence that the university was “taking extreme measures,” including widespread surveillance and pressuring students’ families, to prevent them from speaking out on labor issues. “On the other hand, I have seen no evidence of student wrongdoing,” he wrote. Renmin did not respond to a request for comment. “The road for China will inevitably get wider and wider, while the path for the few forces who reject cooperation with us will only get more and more narrow,” it said. The school exchanges, which began in 2014, typically included about 10 U.S. undergraduate students studying at Renmin in the summer, followed by a handful of Chinese students studying at Cornell for the longer fall semester. Several Chinese students are still at Cornell, and the U.S. university has pledged to support them as they finish their studies as planned. Friedman said he would like the exchanges to resume when there is evidence that academic freedom has improved. With the acceleration of the U.S. trade war with China, coercive technology transfer, intellectual property protection, and academic espionage and theft have all emerged as part of the battlefront. On Sept. 13, Rep. Francis Rooney (R-Fla.) introduced the Stop Higher Education Espionage and Theft Act of 2018 to stop foreign intelligence services from using college exchange programs to steal technology, recruit agents and spread propaganda. By Michael Martina. The Epoch Times contributed to this report.

版权声明:本文为原创文章,版权归 st0012 所有,欢迎分享本文,转载请保留出处!